The role of prostate size in determining serumic PSA values in patients in grey zone patients

Received: 26-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. OAR-24-128804; Accepted: 25-Mar-2024, Pre QC No. OAR-24-128804(PQ); Editor assigned: 28-Feb-2024, Pre QC No. OAR-24-128804(PQ); Reviewed: 13-Mar-2024, QC No. OAR-24-128804(Q); Revised: 22-Mar-2024, Manuscript No. OAR-24-128804(R); Published: 29-Mar-2024

Introduction

Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) disease is rare before the age of 30 years old in men. After the age of 50 years, the disease appears more often, and the obstructive symptoms are present in around 50% of men at the age of 75 years and in 30% of men at the age of 80 years at which prostatectomy intervention is required. The presence of testicular androgens and estrogens hormones are necessary in the development of the prostate in the embryo and its intensive growth until puberty.

All markers used in for prostate cancer screening the most important is the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA). As tumor markers may serve specific products of tumor cells, their metabolites including also molecular markers. Since PSA is produced by benign cells and is also found in malignant prostate cells, they certainly do not represent an ideal tumor marker. An ideal tumor marker should be strongly specific and positive only in the presence of prostate cancer and adverse to other diseases. PSA is not quite sensitive which comes from the fact that 38% to 48% of patients with intra-prostatic carcinoma have normal PSA levels.

If the upper limit of normal PSA serum levels is considered to be 4 ng/ml, PSA as a prostate cancer tumor marker compared to BPH has a specificity of 49% and sensitivity of 71%. Despite these shortcomings in clinical practice, PSA currently represents the best tumor marker for prostate cancer detection. It is observed that PSA levels increases with age even without cancer existence. The reason for this occurence is that the prostate volume growth is due to the development of BPH, but also contribute to the subclinical prostatitis, ischemia , infarct of the prostate and "leakage" of PSA, which is higher in old age man.

Starting from the 5^th decade of life, PSA levels rise even in the absence of prostate cancer. Its level will increase also in the next decade. Older men have higher PSA values compared to younger males [1-7].

Today, there is a large number of tests for the PSA assessment, among them of which the most common is the Tandem R, where 100% of healthy people younger than 40 years and 97% of healthy people older than 40 years having PSA values up to 4.0 ng/ml. The examined persons older than 40 years do not have the PSA value above 10 ng/ml [8].

Similar to this test, there is the tandem E test which differs from the previous one where, instead of radioactive antibodies, alkaline phosphatase enzyme associated with the antibody is used, even when normal values for this test are 0 to 4 ng/ml [7].

PSA "gray zone" represents serum PSA values between 4.1 ng/ml to 10 ng/ml. It is named gray zone because the cause of serum PSA levels to increase may be due to different clinical conditions such as prostate cancer, BPH, prostatitis, ischemia and prostate infarct as well as various changes caused by age. To distinguish the causes of high serum PSA levels from prostate cancer, in clinical practice, prostate biopsy is necessary [7].

Material and Method

Prospectively and retrospectively 1420 patients with LUTS (Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms) were analyzed. Patients were treated for BPH in the University Clinical Center of Kosovo Urology Clinic, during the period of time: January 2010-October 2020.

Research involving human subjects that is reported in the manuscript have been approved by the local ethical commission board from the University of Prishtina. Research carried out on humans was in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for participation in the study was obtained from participants. Data recorded from patients: age, prostate size estimated by transabdominal ultrasound using 3.5 MHz sonde, according to the ellipsoid formula, where V=D1 × D2 × D3/2.5 or Volume of prostate formula, T × AP × CC × Pi/6 where T=Transverse diameter, AP=Antero-Posterior diameter, CC=Cranial Caudal diameter. Also a Digital Rectal Exam (DRE) examination of prostate was performed. In cases suspected for prostate malignity ultrasound guided biopsy was performed.

Patients in which prostate cancer was confirmed were excluded from the study.

PSA values were calculated using IRMA method (Immunoradiometric Assay) monoclonal antibodies were obtained by a manufacturing company. The manufactured product is Immunotech-manufacturing company (Czech Republic). Laboratory analysis was conducted at the Institute of Physiology and Immunology in UCCK in Pristina. Determination of PSA levels was based on the use of two different types of mouse monoclonal antibodies. Samples of serum or plasma were placed in test tubes incubated with monoclonal antibodies, which were present in the inner wall of the tube, in the presence of a second monoclonal antibody, which was marked with J125. After incubation the content of the test tube was washed so that antibodies tagged with J125 are left and not connected. Afterwards radioactivity was detected with gamma meters. These values are determined by a standard curve. Total PSA concentration in sample is proportional to the radioactivity. Radioactivity was measured by gamma radiation meter type DPC (Detector Positioned Coaxially).

The concentration of total PSA in the range of 146 healthy people is determined by this method. PSA average concentration was 0.77 ng/ml with a standard deviation of 0.76 ng/ml. 95% of the samples had total PSA below 1.8 n g/ml, and 99% of samples below 4.2 ng/ml.

Statistical parameters were calculated for the index of structure, the arithmetic average, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values, as well as linear correlation. Statistical analyses used t-test and Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with 95% and 99% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The research included 1420 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia.

The average age of the patients involved in the research was 67.33 years old (Standard Deviation ± 8.07 years). The youngest patient with benign prostate hyperplasia was 50 years old and the oldest 87 years old. Divided by age group, the largest number of patients 670, or 47.2% belonged to the age group 60 years-69 years old and 420 patients, or 29.6% to the age group 70 years-79 years old, 210 of them, or 14.8% to the age group 50 years-59 years and 120 patients, or 8.5% of the age group 80 years - 89 years (Table 1 and Figure 1).

Tab. 1. Patients included in the survey classified by age group

Figure 1: Structure of patients according to the age group

In our clinical material, most 1030 patients of them, or 72.5% had serum PSA concentration below 4.1 ng/ml, 360 or 25.4% of 4.1ng/ml-10 ng/ml ie belong gray zone (Table 2 and Figure 2).

Tab. 2. Patients according to the concentration of PSA values

Figure 2: Structure of patients belonging to the "gray zone"

Table 3 in the average prostate volume of gray zone patients and patients with PSA concentration <4.1 ng/ml. The average prostate volume for gray zone patients was 44.6 cm3 (Standard Deviation (SD) ± 11.6 cm3), while the average prostate volume patients with PSA values <4.1 ng/ml was 36.9 cm3 (Standard Deviation ± 8.2 cm3). T-test obtained a distinction with a high statistical sig-nificance between prostate volume of the two groups (t=4.328, p<0.0001).

Tab. 3. Values of PSA and prostate volume in "gray zone" patients

Table 4 Shows the average age of gray zone patients and patients with PSA concentration <4.1 ng/ml. The average age of gray zone patients was 71.00 years (± standard deviation 7.00 years), whereas the average age of patients with PSA values <4.1ng/ml was 66.00 years (standard deviation ± 8.00 years). With T-test it is shown a distinction with high statistical age significance between patients in both groups (t=3.329, p<0:001).

Tab. 4. PSA values and age in "gray zone" patients

In "gray zone" patients using a MULTIPEL correlation a positive correlation of a low level (R=0.293) between age, prostate volume and serum PSA values was gained. I.e. by aging–prostate and serum PSA levels increase (Table 5 and Figure 3).

Figure 3: Correlation between age, prostate volume and PSA value to gray zone patients

Discussion

Despite the fact that PSA today is considered the leading tumor marker in prostate cancer detection, it is still far away as being an ideal tumor marker. Ideal tumor markers should be strongly specific to prostate cancer and negative to other diseases in the present study, PSA does not fulfill this condition. PSA also is not very sensitive, from the fact that 38% to 48% of patients with intraprostatic cancer have normal PSA values. Despite these shortcomings PSA is still considered the main tumor marker tool in prostate carcinoma detection [7-35].

PSA is strongly correlated with prostate volume and age in patients with BPH. It is proven that at the age of 60 years, the incidence of BPH is around 60%, whereas in the eighth decade approximately in 95.5% of men BPH is present [7, 11].

Increased serum PSA values except BPH and prostate cancer also affects many other factors such as urethral catheterization, acute prostate inflammation, AUR (Acute Urinary Retention), then endourologic interventions such as cystoscopy, Transurethral Resection of The Prostate (TURP) and prostate biopsy [4]. A correlation between AUR and PSA was determined in patients with chronic prostate inflammation [4].

PSA level above 4 ng/ml were detected in 64% of AUR patients and 38% in patients without AUR. Mean PSA levels in patients with chronic prostate inflammation in AUR was 7.75 ng/ml while in patients without AUR was 5.32 ng/ml [4].

Nadler and colleagues also suggested that prostate chronic inflammation increased PSA levels and these data were more compatible with other authors results such as Iran and colleagues who also demonstrated that inflammation in the prostate biopsy has significantly increased PSA levels as a result of damaged glandular epithelium [4].

Damage to the integrity of the prostate gland from inflammation may be the main cause of increased PSA values in the group with AUR (Acute Urinary Retention).

Every pathology that damages the prostate glands leads to distribution of prostate intraluminal secretion through stromal vascular structures and thus increases serum PSA levels. For that particular reason we suggest that prostate chronic inflammation seems to play a very important role in patients with AUR as a result of BPH and consequently increases PSA serum levels [35-40].

Conclusion

The data confirms that prostate volume and PSA concentration of serumic PSA have significant correlation and rises with aging among the “grey zone” patients .

Authors Contribution

A E.N made substantial contribution to conception and study design and data collection. AE.N , I,M, LS, XhC were involved in refining the study design ,statistical analysis and drafting manu-script. All authors read and approved the final manuscript .

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge support from Urology Clinic, University Clinical Center in Prishtina.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1. Vesely S, Knutson T, Damber JE, Dicuio M, Dahlstrand C. Relationship between age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, symptom score and uroflowmetry in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37:322-328.

   [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chung BH, Hong SJ, Cho JS, Seong DH. Relationship between serum prostate‐specific antigen and prostate volume in Korean men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicentre study. BJU Int. 2006;97:742-746.

   [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hedelin H, Johansson N, Ströberg P. Relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms and correlation between prostate volume and serum prostate-specific antigen in clinical routine. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39:154-159.

   [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kefi A, Koseoglu H, Celebi I, Yorukoglu K, Esen A. Relation between acute urinary retention, chronic prostatic inflammation and accompanying elevated prostate-specific antigen. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40:155-160.

   [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Tanagho EA, McAninch JW, Smith DR. Smith's general urology. 2004.

   [Google Scholar]

6. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Matveev VB, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;53:68-80.

   [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mochtar CA, Kiemeney LA, Van Riemsdijk MM, Barnett GS, Laguna MP, et al. Prostate-specific antigen as an estimator of prostate volume in the management of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol. 2003;44:695-700.

   [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Marberger MJ, Andersen JT, Nickel JC, Malice MP, Gabriel M, et al. Prostate Volume and Serum Prostate–Specific Antigen as Predictors of Acute Urinary RetentionCombined Experience from Three Large Multinational Placebo–Controlled Trials. Eur Urol. 2000;38:563-568.

   [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Roehrborn CG, Boyle P, Gould AL, Waldstreicher J. Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of prostate volume in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol. 1999;53:581-589.

   [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jacobsen SJ, Jacobson DJ, Girman CJ, Roberts RO, Rhodes T, et al. Natural history of prostatism: risk factors for acute urinary retention. Urol. 1997;158:481-487.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Roehrborn CG, Malice MP, Cook TJ, Girman CJ. Clinical predictors of spontaneous acute urinary retention in men with LUTS and clinical BPH: a comprehensive analysis of the pooled placebo groups of several large clinical trials.  Urol. 2001;58:210-216.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Roehrborn CG, Boyle P, Bergner D, Gray T, Gittelman M, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume predict long-term changes in symptoms and flow rate: results of a four-year, randomized trial comparing finasteride versus placebo. Urol. 1999;54:662-669.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bo M, Ventura M, Marinello R, Capello S, Casetta G, et al. Relationship between Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA) and volume of the prostate in the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in the elderly. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. 2003;47:207-211.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hochberg DA, Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA. Relationship of prostate‐specific antigen and prostate volume in patients with biopsy proven benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate. 2000;45:315-319.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Di Silverio F, Sciarra A, D'Eramo G, Casale P, Loreto A, et al. Relationship among age, prostate‐specific antigen, and prostate volume in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and in different groups of men with and without benign and malignant prostate diseases. Prostate. 1998;36:1-7.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jacobsen SJ, Jacobson DJ, Girman CJ, Roberts RO, Rhodes T, et al. Natural history of prostatism: risk factors for acute urinary retention. J Urol. 1997;158:481-487.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Emberton M, Anson K. Acute urinary retention in men: an age old problem. BMJ. 1999;318:921-925.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gustafsson O, Mansour E, Norming U, Carlsson A, Törnblom M, et al. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density and age-adjusted PSA reference values in screening for prostate cancer: A study of a randomly selected population of 2,400 men. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1998;32:373-377.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Anjum I, Ahmed M, Azzopardi A, Mufti GR. Prostatic infarction/infection in acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 1998;160:792-793.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nadler RB, Humphrey PA, Smith DS, Catalona WJ, Ratliff TL. Effect of inflammation and benign prostatic hyperplasia on elevated serum prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol. 1995;154:407-413.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kessler OJ, Keisari Y, Servadio C, Abramovici A. Role of chronic inflammation in the promotion of prostatic hyperplasia in rats. J. Urol. 1998;159:1049-1053.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hasui Y, Marutsuka K, Asada Y, Ide H, Nishi S, et al. Relationship between serum prostate specific antigen and histological prostatitis in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate. 1994;25:91-96.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Powell PH, Smith PJ, Feneley RC. The identification of patients at risk from acute retention. Br J Urol. 1980;52:520-522.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Klarskov P, Andersen JT, Asmussen CF, Brenøe J, Jensen SK, et al. Symptoms and signs predictive of the voiding pattern after acute urinary retention in men. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1987;21:23-28.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kohnen PW, Drach GW. Patterns of inflammation in prostatic hyperplasia: a histologic and bacteriologic study. J Urol. 1979;121:755-760.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Irani J, Levillain P, Goujon JM, Bon D, Dore B,  et al. Inflammation in benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation with prostate specific antigen value. J Urol. 1997;157:1301-1303.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Scattoni V, Raber M, Montorsi F, Da Pozzo L, Brausi M, et al. Percent of free serum prostate-specific antigen and histological findings in patients undergoing open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol. 1999;36:621-630.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nickel, Downey, Boag. Asymptomatic inflammation and/or infection in benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 1999;84:976-981.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol. 1984;132:474-479.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Partin AW, Oesterling JE, Epstein JI, Horton R, Walsh PC. Influence of age and endocrine factors on the volume of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 1991;145:405-409.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Collins GN, Lee RJ, McKelvie GB, Rogers AC, Hehir M. Relationship between prostate specific antigen, prostate volume and age in the benign prostate. Br J Urol. 1993;71:445-450.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Uygur MC, Erol D, Çetinkaya M, Güngen Y, Laleli Y, et al. The correlation between prostate-specific antigen and age. Eur Urol. 1997;32:416-419.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Morote J, Encabo G, Lopez M, De Torres IM. Prediction of prostate volume based on total and free serum prostate–specific antigen: is it reliable?. Eur Urol. 2000;38:91-95.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Eckhardt MD, van Venrooij GE, Boon TA. Symptoms and quality of life versus age, prostate volume, and urodynamic parameters in 565 strictly selected men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol. 2001;57:695-700.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Birkhoff JD. Natural history of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Inbenign Prostatic Hypertrophy. 1983:5-9.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Boyle P, Napalkov P. Epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Current perspectives. Eur Urol. 1996;29:7-11.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Abrams P. New words for old: lower urinary tract symptoms for “prostatism”. BMJ. 1994;308:929-930.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Neziri A, Tartari F, Fetahu A, Selmani L, Veselaj F. Gray zone patients in our clinical data. Am J Health Res. 2015;3:381-385.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Richardson TD, Oesterling JE. Age-specific reference ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen. Urol Clin. 1997;24:339-351.

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Hedelin H, Johansson N, Stroberg P. Uneven quality of referrals for lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Lakartidningen. 2003;100:1435‑1437. 

    [Google Scholar] [Crossref]